A groundbreaking study published on December 12, 2025, shows that current AI-based weather prediction systems struggle to simulate the famous “butterfly effect”: the real-world chaos where a tiny change, like a butterfly flapping its wings, can dramatically alter weather two weeks later. Researchers tested leading AI models and found that most cannot properly show how small errors grow fast and spread across the globe.
Scientists Tobias Selz and George Craig from Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich compared top AI-based weather prediction with traditional physics-based systems. They discovered that AI-based weather prediction tools either completely miss the butterfly effect or create fake versions caused by computer glitches, not real atmospheric physics.
The butterfly effect sets the natural limit on how far ahead we can accurately forecast weather, usually around two weeks. Traditional models correctly show tiny initial errors exploding in stormy areas, then spreading to affect the entire planet. AI models, however, behave very differently.
AI-based Weather Prediction: Key Findings of the Research

Researchers tested six important signs of the real butterfly effect (AI-based Weather Prediction):
Ever wondered why models cannot accurately predict weather more than a week out?
— Sekai Chandra (@Sekai_WX) December 7, 2025
It’s because initial condition errors get too large.
Models always initialize incorrectly, and these errors grow as the model runs, leading to eventually useless solutions, like this sorcery below. pic.twitter.com/kmfcaQMUrr
- No Real Chaos Detected: One group of AI models showed zero signs of the butterfly effect.
- Fake Signals from Noise: Another group appeared to show fast error growth, but this came from numerical noise in GPUs, not actual weather physics.
- Hardware Matters: The fake butterfly effect vanished completely when researchers ran the same AI models on CPUs instead of GPUs.
- Training Data is the Problem: Model size, design, and architecture made little difference – the real issue lies in the limited weather data used for training.
- Missing Convection Physics: AI systems fail to properly capture how thunderstorms and heat release drive rapid error growth in the real atmosphere.
Also Read: Latest Mobile Marketing Statistics: Key Stats
The study concludes that current training datasets lack the detail needed to teach AI the true chaotic nature of weather. Until scientists solve this data problem, AI-based weather prediction cannot match the physical accuracy of traditional models when forecasting beyond 10–14 days. Weather agencies and tech companies now face a major challenge to improve training methods before AI can fully replace conventional systems.
More News To Read: AI Godfather Warns About Impact of AI on Jobs